Ten questions to identify where growth is creating friction — and what to do about it.
The Five Phases of Scaling
Phase 1 — Intuition
Pattern Recognition & Feel
The PM operates on pattern recognition and feel. Returns are strong; the edge is real but poorly articulated. Risk is managed instinctively. The book is small enough that mistakes are survivable and fast to recover from.
⚠ Friction point: Overconfidence and absence of systematic feedback loops. Works until scale amplifies the cost of instinctive errors.
Phase 2 — Process
Formalising What Works
The PM begins to formalise what works. Investment criteria, position sizing frameworks, and review protocols start to emerge. The shift from gut to system is underway — but can create rigidity if the process becomes a substitute for thinking rather than a support for it. Growth also introduces reliance on others: analysts or AI are now doing directed or independent research, which only works if the PM can articulate what they are looking for.
⚠ Friction point: Process without a recovery protocol — and without a people framework. PMs build systems for investing but rarely build systems for bouncing back from drawdowns, or for directing analysts and communicating their edge clearly enough that others can research on their behalf.
Phase 3 — EQ & Self-Awareness
The Psychological Dimension
The PM begins to notice the psychological dimension of performance. They can identify when they are in a reactive state versus a clear one. Loss aversion, anchoring, and overtrading become visible patterns rather than invisible forces. The critical skill at this phase is creating separation between stimulus and response — pausing long enough to act from clarity rather than impulse. Move quickly, but under control.
⚠ Friction point: Awareness without tools. Knowing you're reactive doesn't automatically resolve it. This phase requires active self-management practices, not just observation.
Phase 4 — Risk Management
Discipline as Practice
Risk is treated as a discipline, not just a constraint. The PM has internalised how their edge interacts with market conditions and position sizing — and has a clear view of when to press and when to reduce exposure. The mindset, skill, and portfolio are finally aligned.
⚠ Friction point: Risk management excellence can create over-caution. The PM who once ran boldly now defaults to preservation. Finding the balance between protection and expression is the challenge here.
Phase 5 — CEO / Architect
Leading at Altitude
The PM has transitioned into an organisational leader. Research direction, culture, talent development, and investor relationships all fall within their remit. The challenge is retaining the intellectual passion that created the track record while operating at this altitude.
⚠ Friction point: Drive and engagement erosion. PMs who loved getting inside the soul of a business can find themselves drowning in administration. Re-finding the craft within the architecture is the work of this phase.
Rate each statement from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). There are no right answers — the value is in seeing where friction clusters.
Domain 1 — Metrics & Process
1. When I make an investment mistake, I have a structured review process that helps me extract a clear lesson and move on.
Disagree
Agree
2. I can articulate my investment edge clearly in writing — not just feel it.
Disagree
Agree
3. I have a deliberate process for recovering from stress periods — as rigorous as my process for researching investments.
Disagree
Agree
Domain 2 — Self-Awareness
4. When my position sizing increases significantly, my decision-making quality stays consistent.
Disagree
Agree
5. I can identify the specific conditions — mental, physical, situational — under which I make my best decisions.
Disagree
Agree
6. During a drawdown, I rarely find myself making changes to my book that I later regret.
Disagree
Agree
7. After an extended period of strong returns, my gross exposure and position sizing remain governed by the same process as during neutral periods — not by recent performance.
Disagree
Agree
Domain 3 — Drive & Discipline After Success
8. The work feels as engaging as it did when I first started managing money — the hunger to find and evaluate new ideas hasn't faded with success.
Disagree
Agree
9. My time and attention remain primarily on generating and evaluating investment ideas — not on managing the business, team, or investor relationships.
Disagree
Agree
10. After a period of strong performance, my pace of generating and evaluating new ideas stays consistent — strong returns don't reduce my urgency to keep hunting.
Disagree
Agree
Answer all 10 questions to see your results.
Almost there
Where should we send your results?
Enter your details below to see your diagnostic results and receive a personal note from Michael.
Skip and see results
Your details are only used to follow up on your results. No marketing lists. No spam.
Metrics & Process
Self-Awareness
Drive & Discipline After Success
Where to focus
Recommended next steps
These patterns are addressable — but they require deliberate work. If you'd like to explore what a coaching engagement looks like, I'm happy to have a conversation.
Go deeper: The Success Trap
The forces behind this diagnostic are explored in detail in the white paper The Success Trap: How Winning Becomes the Risk — a research-backed look at why strong PMs underperform after scaling, and what to do about it.